01.15.26

Improving retirement outcomes: The impact of TIAA Traditional in qualified default target-date glidepaths

A 2025 update to research sponsored by the TIAA Institute and conducted by Charles River Associates examined whether replacing part of the fixed income bond allocation with TIAA Traditional within qualified default target-date glidepaths improves retirement outcomes. The updated analysis extends the original 2024 study with three additional years of data (2022-2024), focusing on retirement outcomes during a period of significant interest rate volatility.

Summary

The research analyzed 27 different scenarios using 52 years of historical data (1973-2024), comparing standard target-date glidepaths with those that replaced a portion of bond funds with TIAA Traditional. The updated findings show that TIAA Traditional improved retirement outcomes in 93% of scenarios, up from 89% in the original study. Portfolios with TIAA Traditional averaged $78,327 higher residual balances—a 16% increase from the 2024 study findings. The research demonstrates that including TIAA Traditional in target-date glidepaths can be particularly valuable during periods of interest rate volatility, providing enhanced retirement security through guaranteed positive returns, reduced interest rate risk, and greater asset preservation for estate planning purposes.

Key Insights

  • TIAA Traditional improved retirement outcomes in 93% of scenarios, with winning portfolios averaging $88,879 more in residual balances
  • During 2022-2024 market volatility, TIAA provided annuitants with 5% and 3% income increases while bond funds (Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index) returned -7.1%
  • All portfolio risk profiles benefited, with conservative portfolios showing 6.7% higher residual balances and aggressive portfolios demonstrating the greatest relative improvement
  • Standard portfolios needed to annuitize 31% of assets to achieve the same guaranteed income level throughout retirement compared to 26% of portfolios with TIAA Traditional

Replacing some bond allocation with TIAA Traditional in a glidepath more often resulted in higher accumulation at retirement and larger estate value, with lower risk to the participant.

Methodology

Charles River Associates analyzed 27 scenarios using 52 years of historical data (1973-2024), examining nine different working start dates and retirement dates across three equity portfolio weights (conservative, moderate, aggressive). The study compared outcomes of standard target-date glidepaths with those that replaced a portion of bond fund allocation with TIAA Traditional, measuring performance during working life and as a source of income in retirement. The 2025 update added three years of data to capture the impact of significant interest rate volatility, with retirement lengths ranging from 15 to 30 years to better align with experienced retirement durations.

Balance for glidepaths with and without TIAA Traditional
Previous reports
Authors
Conrad Ciccotello

University of Denver

Miguel Herce

Charles River Associates Intl

Mark Meyer

Charles River Associates Intl

Sign up for the TIAA Institute newsletter

Get the latest research and insights straight in your inbox

We are sorry.

The service that receives your request is unavailable at the moment. Please try again.