04.02.26

Putting the “IS” into ERISA: Why lifetime income belongs in retirement plans

Research Brief

Saving for retirement is only half the equation. This TIAA Institute research brief makes the evidence-based case for why guaranteed lifetime income must be a core component of retirement plan design, not just during accumulation, but throughout the entire retirement journey.

Summary

Drawing on multiple research studies, this brief presents three complementary themes that together build a compelling case for lifetime income in retirement plans. First, incorporating guaranteed lifetime income products into target-date glidepaths produces superior outcomes in 93% of scenarios, with participants maintaining significantly higher residual balances compared to standard portfolios. Second, behavioral research reveals that retirees spend 80–85% of lifetime income but only about 50% of withdrawable savings, a pattern of systematic underconsumption that reduces quality of life and leads to unintended bequests. Guaranteed income gives retirees a psychological "license to spend." Third, participant demand has grown dramatically, with 93% of 401(k) participants now saying it is important for their plans to offer guaranteed income options, up from roughly 60% in 2021, with strong and consistent interest across all generations and demographics. Together, these findings demonstrate that lifetime income is not simply another investment option, it is the missing ingredient that transforms adequate savings into true retirement security.

Key Insights

  • Portfolios incorporating guaranteed lifetime income outperformed standard portfolios in 93% of scenarios, with participants maintaining an average of $78,327 more in residual balances.
  • Retirees spend approximately 80–85% of lifetime income but only 50% of withdrawable savings, demonstrating a powerful behavioral barrier that guaranteed income uniquely overcomes.
  • Converting savings to lifetime income could increase retirement consumption by as much as 80% for married households and 33% for single households.
  • 93% of 401(k) participants say it is important for their plans to offer guaranteed income options, a dramatic rise from approximately 60% in 2021, with demand consistent across all generations and income levels.
  • 95% of target-date fund investors say including a guaranteed fixed annuity component in their target-date fund would be valuable, signaling strong support for integrating lifetime income into the most widely used default investment vehicle.

64% of Americans worry more about running short of money in retirement than they do about dying, yet most retirement plans still lack the guaranteed income options that could directly address this fear.

Methodology

This research brief synthesizes findings from several complementary studies. The participant outcomes analysis draws on 2025 research conducted by Charles River Associates for the TIAA Institute, which analyzed more than five decades of market data (1973–2024) across 27 scenarios to assess the impact of incorporating TIAA Traditional into qualified default target-date glidepaths. Complementary findings come from a study by John Shoven and Daniel Walton (NBER, 2023) examining Target Retirement Funds that use deferred life annuities, based on 1,000 simulated 30-year futures. The behavioral spending analysis is based on research by Michael Finke using Health and Retirement Study data covering more than 7,400 observations across ten survey waves. Demand data are drawn from the 2024 TIAA Institute–Nuveen Participant Perspectives Survey, which polled more than 2,100 401(k) participants on their attitudes toward guaranteed income options in retirement plans.

The image depicts a group of people in a modern, abstract setting representing the diverse population facing retirement challenges.
Sign up for the TIAA Institute newsletter

Get the latest research and insights straight in your inbox

We are sorry.

The service that receives your request is unavailable at the moment. Please try again.