02.28.17

Organic Benchmarks for University Endowments

Full Report
Insights Report
Executive Summary

Can a university’s characteristics be a better indicator of an endowment’s effectiveness than endowment size?

Summary

Organic benchmarks based on university characteristics – such as tuition discounts, per-student endowment, endowment payments to university budget, and total student enrollment – can be telling measures of endowment effectiveness. By comparing university goals with the use of endowment assets, this study shows that endowment size alone does not sufficiently measure endowment asset performance.

Key Insights

  • Organic benchmarks need to reflect the areas a university seeks to improve the most using endowment assets.
  • Endowment size is just as ambiguous as organic benchmarks in evaluating how effectively endowment assets are being employed.
  • Organic benchmark results should be compared only among universities similar enough to make legitimate comparisons.

Larger endowments experience more growth when employing organic benchmarks.

Methodology

The author examined endowment performance at 898 universities between 2002 and 2014. Using data from NACUBO and the National Center for Education Statistics, he separated the universities into three groups based on endowment size and university characteristics to measure how effectively universities manage their endowment assets.

Author

Cristian Ioan Tiu

University at Buffalo, SUNY

Sign up for the TIAA Institute newsletter

Get the latest research and insights straight in your inbox

We are sorry.

The service that receives your request is unavailable at the moment. Please try again.

Related Publications