08.11.25

Consequences of College Affordability: Barriers for Future Financial Well-being

Research Brief

The TIAA Institute and Trellis Strategies examine how student loan debt affects borrowers' financial decisions, behaviors, and well-being in the aftermath of the federal loan repayment pause.

Summary

This research investigates the complex relationship between student loan borrowers their financial wellness through a survey of 2,001 student loan borrowers conducted mid-May to mid-July 2024. The study explores how borrowers make decisions about taking on student debt, what drives their loan utilization choices, how the federal repayment pause (2020-2023) affected their financial behaviors, and how these patterns vary demographically. Findings reveal that despite high costs and significant debt burdens, most borrowers continue to view higher education as worthwhile, with 62% of degree completers agreeing their degree improved their quality of life. However, the research also uncovers concerning impacts of student loan debt on financial security, including limiting housing options, delaying homeownership, and creating barriers to long-term financial planning—particularly for historically marginalized populations.

Key insights

  • Most student borrowers use loans primarily for educational expenses (90% for tuition and fees), but demographic differences exist in how loans are utilized, with male borrowers, Black/African American borrowers, and LGBTQIA+ borrowers more likely to use loans for basic necessities.
  • The federal loan repayment pause revealed significant financial vulnerability among borrowers—while financially stable borrowers often continued payments, others redirected funds to cover basic living expenses.
  • First-generation college students face unique financial challenges but show resilience through stronger budgeting habits, despite reporting greater financial impact from student loan repayment (51% vs. 42%).

 

Despite financial hurdles, education remains valuable—62% of respondents who completed their degree agreed that having the degree improved their quality of life, though 45% indicated student loan repayment had negatively impacted their financial situation.

Methodology

The study surveyed 2,001 student loan borrowers residing in the U.S. who currently have or previously repaid student loans, excluding those currently enrolled in degree programs. Conducted from mid-May to mid-July 2024, the survey collected demographic information to build a diverse, nationally representative sample, with Black or African American respondents intentionally oversampled to better represent their higher-than-average rates of student loan debt. Researchers used a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis (descriptive statistics, Chi-squared tests, and logistic regression models with significance set at p<0.05) with qualitative analysis of free-response questions using a combined deductive/inductive coding approach.

First-gen students show stronger budgeting despite greater loan impact (51% vs. 42%) than peers when repayment resumed.

Contributor

Trellis Strategies logo
Sign up for the TIAA Institute newsletter

Get the latest research and insights straight in your inbox

We are sorry.

The service that receives your request is unavailable at the moment. Please try again.