In 2006, the University of Iowa changed its retirement plan default investment from a money market fund to a target date fund—and the resulting effect on participant behavior was significant.
Summary
Prior research has found that retirement plan default provisions increase plan participation and that defaulting participants tend to stick with default contribution amounts. None of these studies, however, examines how different default investment funds might affect participant choices. This paper uses a natural experiment to document how participant behavior changed after a change in the default investment in the University of Iowa defined contribution pension plan.
Key Insights
- The investment default structure significantly affects default take-up, the "stickiness" of the default, and the contribution allocations of all plan participants.
- Participants who joined under the money-market default—compared to the target date fund default—were less likely to accept the default, and their overall contribution had a lower average percentage of equity.
- Participants with greater financial literacy and experience were less likely to use the default, preferring to customize their investment portfolio instead.
